Tag Archives: GoogleDocs

In the Midst…

Yes! We have started our new NGSS unit, Systems and System Models with our grade 9 students, and so far, so good! I want to use this next blog post to organize my thoughts and get some feedback from you before I get too deep in this unit and project.

My Ideas

https://www.pexels.com/photo/idea-bulb-paper-sketch-8704/

My idea for the organization of my video is to highlight each part of the SAMR Model and demonstrate, through a variety of means, how I am achieving each part of the model with my students and how it is impacting their learning. So, the idea is to spend about two minutes on areas of my unit plan that involve 1) no tech, (and the following parts of the SAMR model) 2) substitution, 3) augmentation, 4) modification, and 5) redefinition. Below you will find some of my examples for each area.

No Tech

There will be certain aspects of this unit that involve absolutely no technology. One example of this that I may showcase is the “carbon cycle discussion and poster.” This activity will represent the “before” picture of what our students understand about the carbon cycle before doing any research or getting any kind of instruction on the concept. I am choosing to include this in my final project video, even though it doesn’t represent how I am incorporating technology into my lessons, because I wanted to get student feedback on the use of technology vs. no technology for certain classroom activities. Now on to some tech talk…

By Lefflerd (Own work) [CC BY-SA 4.0], via Wikimedia Commons
Substitution

This part of the SAMR model is when “technology acts as a direct tool substitute, with no functional change.” There are some aspects of this unit that definitely exemplify this part of the model. One example is posting a case study and lab handout that we used in class to Moodle (our online learning forum). Instead of printing out the case study and lab handout for each student, we, essentially, posted it online so that all students had access to those documents. Another example would be using a Google Doc as their “notebook” for this unit. Instead of doing their classwork in a notebook, my students are using a single Google Doc to house all of their information and resources (data collection, images, links, etc.) pertaining to this unit. And the best part is they can’t exactly “lose” it!

Augmentation

This part of the SAMR model is when “technology acts as a direct tool substitute, with functional improvement.” One example of augmentation from this unit is a Socrative “Space Race” quiz. We used this activity as a diagnostic quiz at the beginning of this unit. Instead of printing a quiz and handing it out to each student individually, we allowed them to work in small groups on their computer to answer the questions. On the screen in the front of the room, students could visualize how many questions each group had answered and how many questions each group had gotten correct. It created a bit of competition among the groups, and our students were WAY more engaged 🙂

Modification

This part of the SAMR model is when “technology allows for significant task redesign.” Now that I know about the SAMR model, I am constantly thinking about how I can improve my classroom practice so that I am striving to use technology in a manner more indicative of the modification (and redefinition) stage of the SAMR model. For this unit, we have included the use of The Carbon Cycle Game. It is an online “game,” where you travel through the carbon cycle as a carbon atom based on your answers to each question. This is definitely not something that the students would be able to do without their computers. We haven’t used it yet, but it is planned for this unit. And I am very excited to see how it works out!

Redefinition

And last but not least, this part of the SAMR model is when “technology allows for the creation of new tasks, previously inconceivable.” I believe that we have two clear examples of redefinition in this unit. The first example is not only using Google Docs as their “notebook” for this unit, but the fact that it is shared with me so that I have access to all of the students’ “notes.” I have the ability to comment, chat, and edit their work in real time, as well as the ability to check their revision history. Such functions were unheard of not so long ago. The second example is a product that we are having the students complete toward the end of the unit, which is to create a documentary. They will be creating a documentary on the relationships among the Earth’s systems and how those relationships are being modified due to human activity. Without their computers and certain software, there is no way that my students would be able to take on a task such as this one!

Now What?

https://www.flickr.com/photos/gumuz/7340411

Well…now that I am in the midst of it, that’s what I have so far! I believe that we have a pretty solid plan for this unit that successfully incorporates a variety of technology in a meaningful way for our students. But I want to know what you think! What do you think of my categorizing of the planned activities? Is any of my categorizing mislabeled? What could I add/delete/modify to make this unit plan better? Luckily the unit has just started, and I have a bit of wiggle room if needed! I warmly welcome your comments below 🙂

Course 2 Final Project: Stranger Danger!

Believe it or not, the end of Course 2 is almost upon us! And for the Course 2 Final Project, my group and I chose Option 1. Becky, James, and I have created a Responsible Use Policy that is specific to the grades that we teach. We originally started from scratch, and then, we went on to incorporate many ideas from the responsible use policy used at Becky’s school. Here is what my group came up with for our Course 2 Final Project:

Development

Honestly, I was at a total loss of where to start with this, and I really wanted to be a contributing member of my group 🙂 My school does not currently have any sort of Responsible Use Policy/Agreement, so I did have to start from scratch. Where to first? You might ask! Google, of course! I Googled “responsible use policy agreement,” and this is what came up:

Google Screenshot

Aside from my very knowledgeable group members, my most valuable resources for this project were: Acceptable Use Policy from Wikipedia, Brown University’s Acceptable Use Policy, and Northern Illinois University’s Acceptable Use Policy. I read through these resources and picked apart what might be useful for the acceptable use policy we were creating. A Google Doc was started, and this was the medium through which my group members and I collaborated on this project. It was AWESOME! We were able to add our ideas, notes, thoughts, etc. as well as make comments on our group members’ work. It also allowed us to work on the document as needed when it was most convenient for us. We didn’t all have to be on the document at the same time. We just left notes for each other as we made additions, deletions, and modifications to our policy. I thought that it was a very valuable and interactive way of collaborating and communicating with each other.

Language and Topics

We decided to create an acceptable use policy specifically for students in grades six through nine as all of our group members teach at least one of those grades, and it seemed fitting as those grades are a transitional time for students both leaving elementary school and entering into high school. We choose 4 specific headings: Purpose, Scope, Policy, and Related Links. There were a number of reasons for this. One – many of the other policies that we researched had similar headings to these. Two – we felt that this language would be appropriate for middle school and early high school. And three – we thought these headings were inclusive but not overwhelming . We also chose sub-headings for our Policy section to make it very clear for our students to understand the policy, and those sub-headings included: Acceptable Use of Technology, Unacceptable Use of Technology, Code of Conduct: Netiquette, and Consequences.

My group focused on topics that we thought were most relevant to our students. Within the Policy section, we gave explicit examples of acceptable and unacceptable uses of technology. We wrote our policy with our students in mind hoping that they will read and easily understand the policy we have created for them.

Photo Credit: sinkdd via Compfight cc

Focus

I titled my post: Stranger Danger! because I feel that our responsible use policy is helping to keep our students safe. When I was a little girl, I remember my parents sitting me down and discussing how important it was NOT to talk to strangers and what to do in situations that might involve strangers. My parents just wanted to keep me safe. And in a way, I feel like we are doing this with our students through the creation of our acceptable use policy. Yes, it includes the dos and don’ts of technology use, but the purpose of creating such a policy, ultimately, is to keep our students safe.

Sharing is caring 🙂

Now that we have created this policy, we must share it with our students, and I am not exactly sure how I am going to do this just yet! Instead of just sharing the document with them and discussing it, I was hoping to come up with a more fun and interactive way of sharing this information with my students. What do you think? I warmly welcome your comments below.

Course 1 Final Project: Who Are YOU?

That’s the question I am asking my students. Who are YOU? With our school theme this year, You, Me, Community!, I thought that incorporating a project that allows my students to answer this very question was fitting. AND the end is near…for Course 1, that is! It went by very fast, and here I am presenting my Course 1 Final Project on my blog 🙂

Some Background

For my Final Project, I decided to use a unit that I have previously used at another school. I have been planning on revamping this unit and using it at my current school, and now, I finally had a chance to do just that! This unit plan has been designed for a grade 9 Integrated Science course specifically the chemistry portion of the course. The main topic is the periodic table, and the title of this unit is: Chemical Identity Mask Project. In short, my students will create a physical mask that is representative of themselves (answering the question, Who Are YOU?) AND an element from the periodic table, as well as an artist statement video that communicates their chemical identity. Here are some examples from my previous school:

Element Fluorine
Element Helium
Element Tungsten
Element Potassium

Modifications

Upon the revamp of this unit, I have slightly modified the steps leading up to the creation of the mask to allow for increased understanding of those steps and how they relate to the overall project. I have also added in two crucial technology components. The first technology component is the use of a Google Doc for students to document and collaborate on their work, and for me, as the teacher, to more easily review their work, check for their understanding, and provide feedback as the project progresses. The second technology component is the creation of a video in order to communicate and share their artist statement.

My Learning in Course 1

This unit plan links to my learning in Course 1 in a number of ways. In Week 3, we learned about designing and adapting relevant learning experiences that incorporate digital tools and resources to promote student learning and creativity. During that week, we were assigned to read 21 Things for the 21st Century Teacher, where these “21 Things” were outlined with important information and accompanying resources. Google Docs was mentioned in two of the “Things” – cloud initiation and collaboration. I was able to easily and purposefully incorporate Google Docs into this unit plan to further promote student learning. And in Week 4, we learned that teaching and learning are changing with the introduction of new tools. During that week, we were assigned to read Adopt and Adapt: Shaping Tech for the Classroom, and it briefly discussed how videos, like those found on YouTube, have become much more popular in the classroom in recent years. The use of videos in the classroom today is one way that teaching and learning are changing. So, I decided to have my students create a video as part of their project in order to communicate and share their understandings of the chemical elements on the periodic table with their peers while promoting student creativity. 

Course 1 has definitely influenced my attitude and mindset about using technology in the classroom. I can honestly say that I am moving from an educator that is using technology just for the sake of using it towards an educator that is trying to incorporate technology into her teaching practice in a more meaningful and productive manner. The use of Google Docs and video in my unit plan are a primary source of evidence of my mind shift.

Outcomes

When my students have completed this unit, I am hoping that they can identify with and make meaning of the periodic table, as well as make scientific connections between themselves and the world around them. This will (hopefully!) be evidenced in their chemical identity masks and artist statement videos. You can see my full unit plan below:

Final Reflection

I believe that my Final Project is not perfect and has the potential to be improved. It’s a work in progress, like everything in my life! But I also believe that this unit plan shows how I am attempting (and hopefully successfully!) to incorporate and implement technology use with my students in an authentic way. During this unit, my students will be engaged with technology throughout their learning process. In future course final projects, I plan to implement the key theme from Week 5 of Course 1, which is: collaboration on a global scale is a key component of 21st century learning.

Enjoy my Final Project! I am still in the process of developing rubrics for this project – one for the mask and one for the video. If anyone has a particularly excellent rubric for a physical product (like a mask) or a video, please do share! I warmly welcome your comments below.